SSDI

Demystifying, General Info, SSA, SSDI

Neurological Disorders And Social Security Disability

There are a number of neurological disorders that can be considered disabling for Social Security disability purposes, if those disorders meet Social Security’s rules related to limitations and severity. Some disorders, like epilepsy and benign brain tumors can cause the specific impairment of seizures in individuals who have a neurological disorder. An individual who suffers from seizures will be evaluated for potential disability benefits by Social Security according to the rules set by Social Security on neurological disorders. Because seizures are not all the same and people who suffer from them experience different types of limitations, understanding certain things about seizures is valuable to allow Social Security to have a better understanding of how it can impact a claimant. A claimant who suffers from seizures should keep a log of their seizures, depicting the length and severity of the seizure, which will come in handy when Social Security asks for more information about the claimant’s seizures. Below is information from Social Security’s rules related to neurological disorders. We evaluate epilepsy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, coma or persistent vegetative state (PVS), and neurological disorders that cause disorganization of motor function, bulbar and neuromuscular dysfunction, communication impairment, or a combination of limitations in physical and mental functioning such as early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. We evaluate neurological disorders that may manifest in a combination of limitations in physical and mental functioning. For example, if you have a neurological disorder that causes mental limitations, such as Huntington’s disease, which may limit executive functioning (e.g., regulating attention, planning, inhibiting responses, decision-making), we evaluate your limitations using the functional criteria under these listings (see 11.00G). Under this body system, we evaluate the limitations resulting from the impact of the neurological disease process itself. If your neurological disorder results in only mental impairment or if you have a co-occurring mental condition that is not caused by your neurological disorder (for example, dementia), we will evaluate your mental impairment under the mental disorders body system.  

Demystifying, General Info, SSA, SSDI

Wait Times At Social Security Likely To Get Worse In Short Term

We are now approximately half way through the month of January for 2022. The hangover of the Christmas and New Year’s holidays is slowly departing and many people are looking to get back to business as usual, well as much as business as usual during a pandemic can be, but it is likely going to take Social Security a while to handle the backlog of work accrued over the holidays and service times at the agency will likely be longer through the end of the month. Not only is Social Security dealing with work piling up over the holidays, but January is already a busy month for the agency. A portion of Social Security employees retire each year at the end of the year, which leaves the agency with less staff and many older Americans decide to retire and apply for Social Security retirement benefits when a new year hits the calendar increasing workloads at the agency even further. All of these types of things happen every year at Social Security so January can be a tough month for the agency, but adding to the pressure is the fact that Social Security has not received an appropriation from Congress for its Fiscal Year 2022 budget. Until that happens Social Security will be dealing with fewer funds and still has to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic. The new Omicron variant of COVID-19, which has caused missed time for many employees at Social Security, is not helping either. All of these circumstances create difficult times to obtain services from the agency. If you need to do business with Social Security and can wait on conducting that business for a while it would probably be a good idea to attempt to contact Social Security later in the year when things slow down somewhat.

Demystifying, General Info, SSA, SSDI

Medicare Open Enrollment

Most people probably don’t give a lot of thought to Medicare unless they are approaching retirement age or they have been found disabled by the Social Security Administration, but those who do fit into those categories should be aware that Medicare open enrollment has begun. Medicare is health insurance for people 65 and older. Those approaching age 65 can sign-up for Medicare up to three months before turning 65, but older Americans are not the only ones who are eligible for Medicare. The program also is available for people who are younger who qualify for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI). Social Security disability recipients have to go through a waiting period before they are eligible for Medicare. After the waiting period they are automatically enrolled in Medicare unless they opt out. It is no easy task to qualify for Social Security disability benefits. A claimant must prove that they are unable to work at a full-time level due to impairments that will last at least 12 months or longer. Those who are receiving SSDI receive the same type of Medicare benefit as older individuals. There are also other types of Medicare programs that eligible recipients can choose from. Below is a description from Social Security of the open enrollment period that ends March 31, 2022. From January 1 through March 31, Medicare Advantage enrollees can switch from one Medicare Advantage plan to another at www.Medicare.gov. Please encourage your clients to apply for Medicare online if they: Are three months away from age 65. Want to sign up for Medicare but do not currently have ANY Medicare coverage. Do not want to start receiving Social Security benefits at this time. Are not currently receiving Social Security retirement, disability, or survivors benefits. Let your clients know they can learn more about how Social Security and Medicare work together at www.ssa.gov/benefits/medicare, where they can also sign up for Medicare.

Demystifying, General Info, SSA, SSDI

Unvaccinated SSA Employs May Face Suspensions And Possible Firings

In a recent story published online by The Hill it was reported that federal government agencies are preparing to take steps against federal workers who still have not complied with the vaccine mandate set by President Joe Biden and his administration and those steps could lead to suspensions and even firings if federal workers do not comply. This includes employees at the Social Security Administration. Below is a portion of the story that explains the actions the federal government may take against unvaccinated workers. Federal government agencies are preparing to take increasingly harsh steps against unvaccinated employees in order to implement President Biden’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal workers.  Some agencies plan to send letters warning of possible suspensions to employees who have not complied with the mandate. Many are also prepared to fire employees who don’t follow the rule, though such moves would be further down the road. The rate of compliance is high across the federal government, and agencies say they do not expect the suspensions or firings to cause disruptions. There are not a high number of federal workers who remain unvaccinated, but there are still thousands of federal workers who remain unvaccinated who have not presented an appropriate medical or religious exemption from the mandate. According to The Hill, the White House and the Department of Education had reached full compliance with the vaccination mandate prior to January 10, 2022, but other agencies still have not reached full compliance with the mandate, including the Social Security Administration. The story reported that Social Security is doing pretty well with compliance. Close to 99 percent of employees have reached compliance with the mandate and close to a 92 percent vaccination rate, but that still leaves a significant number of Social Security employees who have not complied with the mandate as of yet as well as other employees throughout federal agencies. Considering that the Biden Administration announced the mandate months ago, and has since attempted to try and educate unvaccinated employees about the safety of the vaccines, it now appears the administration is growing impatient with employees who remain unvaccinated and soon could move rather quickly with suspensions or firings. Due to the high compliance rate for most government agencies it was reported by The Hill that any suspensions or firings would not negatively impact services the federal government provides. Below is a portion of the story that explains that changes in staffing are not expected to be a major disruption. This is probably not good news for those who have failed to comply with the mandate whose jobs now appear to be in jeopardy. Agencies have not laid out specific time frames for notifying employees of the suspensions, but experts expect them to move relatively quickly given that four months have passed since Biden announced the rule. When reached by The Hill, multiple agencies insisted they do not expect suspensions or firings due to the vaccine mandate to adversely impact critical government operations.  

General Info, Legal News, SSDI

The Latest With Social Security

We realize it may be a stretch for ordinary people to want to keep up with the comings and goings of the Social Security Administration, but sometimes circumstances permit where someone does want to follow the latest news regarding the agency due to a possible retirement or disability interest. This blog is an ongoing piecemeal of recent stories that have involved Social Security. Some are tidbits and some are important things that should be known in the world of retirement or disability and others are just interesting stories and nothing more. Members of Congress Want Details On Reopening In a bipartisan effort to get answers to when Social Security field offices might open up to the public to provide crucial services, U.S. Rep. John Katko, R-New York and U.S. Rep. Kathleen Rice, D-New York have called on the Social Security Administration to provide information on the agency’s plans to provide ongoing services to the public during the pandemic and to provide more information about when Social Security office may open again for in-person services. Specifically, Katko, in a written letter to Kilolo Kijakazi, Social Security’s acting commissioner, the congressman wanted the following areas addressed. With these concerns in mind, please respond to the following: What is SSA’s timeline and plan for reopening Social Security field offices? While we understand there are limited in person appointments available, what is the plan for expanding these appointments until SSA field offices reach full capacity? What precautions will SSA take to ensure the safety of staff and individuals seeking in-person services through the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic? Thank you for your attention to this critical matter. Your swift response to these important questions will help to alleviate the concerns of many Social Security beneficiaries across the country. Speaking Of The Commissioner On July 9, 2021 Andrew Saul was removed as commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Saul was replaced by Kilolo Kijakazi who is now serving as the agency’s acting commissioner with no news about President Joe Biden nominating a permanent replacement for the top job at Social Security. Having an acting commissioner at Social Security is not entirely a new thing. Prior to Donald Trump being elected President in 2016 Carolyn Colvin served as the agency’s acting commissioner through the end of Barack Obama’s administration. But, considering Biden has more than three years left on his term as president it may be time to have some stability at the top of the Social Security Administration in a permanent Social Security commissioner. There have been several names that have been offered as possible nominations for a permanent Social Security commissioner, but Biden and his administration have been rather quiet on nominating a new commissioner. It might be that the Biden Administration is planning on taking its time with this nomination due to the uncertainty about when Social Security will finally open up field offices for service and the administration wants that action plan in place before nominating a new commissioner.

Demystifying, General Info, SSA, SSDI

Understanding A Social Security Disability Cessation Case

After the Social Security Administration finds a claimant disabled it is usually a relief for the claimant because the Social Security disability process is a long and difficult path, but it is important to understand that this will likely not be the last time Social Security makes a disability determination on the case. Social Security does not define disabilities as permanently disabling and after a few years Social Security is likely to review all the evidence available to determine if the claimant is still disabled and entitled to benefits. If Social Security makes a decision that the claimant has improved medically enough to no longer meet the agency’s disability eligibility the claimant will receive a cessation notice indicating benefits will stop because the agency has determined their disability has ended. At this point the claimant has the option to appeal this decision and can elect to continue to collect benefits during the decision process on the appeal, but if the claimant is not found disabled after the appeal process plays out Social Security can ask for all or a portion of the money received during the appeal process to be returned. Below is an explanation about how the cessation process works and identified by the Social Security Administration. Medical Disability Cessation You may write to us or complete a Form SSA-789-U4 (Request for Reconsideration Disability Cessation). You or your representative must ask in writing for reconsideration within 60 days of the date you receive the written notice of the initial determination. We consider that you receive a notice five days after the date on the notice unless you show us evidence it was received after the five days. Payment Continuation for non-medical initial determination and medical disability cessation determination: Non-Medical Initial Determination If you ask for reconsideration in writing within 10 days of the date you receive the notice, any payment we are currently making will continue until we make our reconsideration determination if you continue to meet all other SSI eligibility requirements. If you ask for a reconsideration more than 10 days after the date you receive the notice, but within 60 days of the date you receive the notice, your payment may decrease temporarily. However, we will restart any payment we are currently making once we receive and enter your reconsideration. You will continue to receive that payment until we make our reconsideration determination if you continue to meet all other SSI eligibility requirements. If you do not want to continue to receive payments, you can ask us not to continue payments by completing Form SSA-263 (Waiver of Supplemental Security Income Payment Continuation).

General Info, SSA, SSDI

DDS Looking To Add Disability Examiners

If you walk into a store, restaurant or virtually any other sort of business you are likely to see a help wanted sign. The lack of employees across all industries has been felt and it is no difference for Disability Determination Services (DDS). It is the responsibility of disability examiners at DDS to make disability determinations on Social Security disability cases at the lower levels of claims. Recently the National Association of Disability Examiners released its latest newsletter. The newsletter indicated information about DDS’ 2021 training conference where it was revealed that DDS is in need of more disability examiners to handle the load of disability cases. Below is a portion of the newsletter that discusses DDS’ challenge of maintaining a well staffed group of disability examiners. Hiring has increased, but John acknowledged that hiring has been difficult across the country with fewer applicants and fewer people accepting positions. Training a large number of new examiners contributed to our inability to meet the clearance goal for claims at the initial level this year. The good news is there’s been no reduction in budgets for hiring or overtime. ODD anticipates that overtime will be available throughout the next year. Jeremy was optimistic for a continuing resolution with hiring authority in place until December. . He noted that in FY 2020, DDS reported 15 applicants per available position with the agency. In FY 2021, that number fell to nine people applying for each job. Overtime will be available in the first quarter, he said. There should be enough to meet all DDS needs. Workloads are expected to increase, so overtime will be made available to work that increase. There will be a lot of attention on processing time in the coming year. Each agency will have goals to meet in this regard in FY 2022.    

Demystifying, General Info, SSA, SSDI

What Counts What Doesn’t For SSI Eligibility

Many people who apply for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) are not aware of the specific non-disability related rules. These are technical rules that limit eligibility for the program to people who are disabled or elderly with limited income and assets. Because Social Security’s rules can be confusing it is a good idea to learn what resources are counted and which resources are not to determine eligibility. Below are program rules for SSI set forth by the Social Security Administration. WHAT ARE RESOURCES? Resources are things you own such as: cash; bank accounts, stocks, U.S. savings bonds; land; life insurance; personal property; vehicles; anything else you own which could be changed to cash and used for food or shelter; and deemed resources. WHAT ARE DEEMED RESOURCES? Sometimes we “deem” a portion of the resources of a spouse, parent, parent’s spouse, sponsor of an alien, or sponsor’s spouse as belonging to the person who applies for SSI. We call this process the deeming of resources. If a child under age 18 lives with one parent, $2,000 of the parent’s total countable resources does not count. If the child lives with 2 parents, $3,000 does not count. We count amounts over the parents’ limits as part of the child’s $2,000 resource limit. WHY ARE RESOURCES IMPORTANT IN THE SSI PROGRAM? The value of your resources is one of the factors that determines whether you are eligible for SSI benefits.  However, not all resources count for SSI.  If the value of your resources that we count is over the allowable limit at the beginning of the month, you cannot receive SSI for that month.  If you decide to sell the excess resources for what they are worth, you may receive SSI beginning the month after you sell the excess resources. You may even be able to receive benefits while you try to sell the excess resources in certain situations. WHAT IS THE RESOURCE LIMIT? The limit for countable resources is $2,000 for an individual and $3,000 for a couple. WHAT RESOURCES DO NOT COUNT FOR SSI? For SSI, we do not count: the home you live in and the land it is on; one vehicle, regardless of value, if you or a member of your household use it for transportation; household goods and personal effects (e.g., your wedding and engagement rings); life insurance policies with a combined face value of $1,500 or less; burial spaces for you or your immediate family; burial funds for you and your spouse, each valued at $1,500 or less (see the SSI Spotlight on Burial Funds); property you or your spouse use in a trade or business, or on your job if you work for someone else (see the SSI Spotlight on Property You Need for Self Support); if you are disabled or blind, money or property you have set aside under a Plan to Achieve Self-Support (PASS) (see the Spotlight on PASS); and up to $100,000 of funds in an Achieving a Better Life Experience (ABLE) account established through a State ABLE program (see the SSI Spotlight on ABLE).

Demystifying, General Info, SSA, SSDI

Study Shows Disability Benefits And Food Insecurities Could Be Connected

Those who know anything about Social Security Disability Insurance benefits (SSDI) understand that if you have been found disabled by the Social Security Administration that disability benefits do not come close to providing all missed income due to an inability to work. People on SSDI would make more money if they were able to continue to work and many SSDI recipients struggle with making ends meet. A recent study, conducted by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, now shows that there is a connection with receiving disability benefits and food insecurities. The study looked at data from 2010 to 2019 to determine that food insecurity rates are higher in counties with high rates of disability beneficiaries compared to lower food insecurity rates when there are fewer disability beneficiaries. There are many more interesting insights gathered in the study. In addition to finding the food insecurity disparities between disability beneficiaries and non beneficiaries, the study also found that disability beneficiaries are more likely to live in areas that have fewer healthy food options. Identifying the problem is important, but solving it would be better. Below are some key points from the study. Following that is the conclusion summing up all the data the study produced. The paper found that: Food insecurity rates are higher in counties with high rates of disability and DI receipt than in those with lower rates of disability and DI receipt. The paper reports that counties with high rates of disability and DI receipt have lower average food costs, but more limited access to food sources than counties with lower rates of disability and DI receipt. The paper also finds that counties with high rates of disability and DI receipts have fewer food establishments. Furthermore, counties with high rates of disability and DI receipt also have a larger supply of unhealthy food options. Conclusion In this paper, we account for access to food—by measuring the availability and accessibility of food stores and restaurants within each county—in the relationship between rates of disability and DI beneficiaries, and food insecurity. In general, we find that counties having a large share of residents with disabilities or high rates of DI beneficiaries are also limited in their availability and accessibility to food establishments. Digging deeper, we find that these same counties also have a larger share of food establishments that likely provide unhealthy food options. These include small grocery stores, convenience stores, limited-service restaurants, pharmacies, and gas stations. We find a strong correlation between many of these types of food establishments and disability and DI beneficiary rates. Importantly, we find a strong correlation between disability and food insecurity even after controlling for access to food. Our results should not be interpreted through a causal lens, however, as they only indicate a correlation between these factors. Linked data, more geographically-specific data, and more information on specific types of disabilities would all be ways to extend this line of research.  

General Info, Legal News, SSA, SSDI

Backlogs Increasing At DDS

A new report issued by Social Security’s Inspector General ‘s office confirmed that the state agencies that are charged with making disability determinations on Social Security disability claims, during the early stages of the process, are receiving less applications to process yet wait times on determinations have increased. The report indicates this trend is likely related to the COVID-19 pandemic, but the Inspector General’s report also concluded another report is likely needed to determine why DDS is receiving less claims and taking longer, but wait times are increasing. One factor that might play a role in backlogs at DDS are the need to send claimants to medical examinations to help make a disability determination, but the number of consultative examinations (CEs) being scheduled by DDS is also down. Many claims were delayed because of COVID-19 and a reduced ability by DDS to find safe types of CE examinations during a pandemic. We are likely to see more delays until the pandemic is behind us, but that is not going to happen anytime soon. Below are the key findings of the Inspector General’s report. Objective To summarize information about State disability determination services’ (DDS) workloads during the COVID-19 pandemic period of April 2020 to March 2021 and compare it to DDS workloads in prior years. Background Once a claimant files a disability application, a Social Security Administration (SSA) field office employee determines whether the individual meets the non-disability criteria for benefits. If the claimant meets these requirements, the employee forwards the claim to the DDS in the State that has jurisdiction for the disability determination. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic. On March 17, 2020, SSA closed its offices to the public. State DDSs experienced periodic closures related to the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, SSA authorized DDSs to allow their employees to continue processing disability claims from home. From SSA’s Office of Disability Determinations’ Management Information dashboard, we obtained State DDS workload information for initial claims, reconsiderations, and continuing disability reviews (CDR). Conclusions Although the DDSs experienced some increases/decreases in their workload categories from year to year for the period April 2016 through March 2021, the largest year-to-year changes occurred from the COVID-19 period of April 2020 to March 2021 compared to the prior-year period (April 2019 to March 2020). DDSs received 15.9 percent fewer initial claims during the COVID-19 period compared to the prior-year period. Additionally, SSA sent 40.2 percent fewer CDRs to the DDS during the COVID-19 period compared to the prior-year period. Despite the decrease in initial claims, DDS processing times increased during the COVID-19 period, which indicates claimants waited longer for DDSs to make medical determinations. Furthermore, even though receipts decreased for initial claims, reconsiderations, and CDRs, the pending workloads for these groups increased—which indicates the DDSs could not keep pace with workloads received. Finally, we noted that DDSs significantly decreased the use of consultative examinations; however, allowance/continuance rates remained relatively the same when comparing the COVID-19 period to the prior-year period. We plan to conduct an additional review to determine why some DDS workload categories significantly changed in the COVID-19 period compared to prior-year period.

Scroll to Top