SSDI

Demystifying, SSA, SSDI

But I'm too old to learn a new job . . . Right?

Basically, the issue before Social Security is: is there some job which you can do on a full time basis? It doesn’t matter if you are a professional, or a laborer, white collar or blue. If you were a surgeon but now can only sit and take tickets at a toll booth on a regular basis, you may not qualify as disabled. But is that always the case? Fortunately … Nope. As you get older the rules begin to change. Social Security has developed a set of medical-vocational guidelines commonly referred to as “the girds.” The basic concept behind the grids is, the older you get the less vocational adjustment you should have to make to return to work. These rules currently begin to change when you approach age 50. They change again at 55, and again at age 60. Eventually, the rules contemplate that unless you can do pretty much the same job you had done in the past, you will be found disabled. There is a chance that these rules may be changed by Congress at some point to account for the fact that people are working longer, and that they change occupations more often now than they did in the past. For example, at some point in the future the grids may not apply until age 55. The idea being that today’s 55 is yesterdays 50. Is it a good idea to make the age limits on the grids higher? Perhaps. But for now the age at which the rules start to change is just prior to your 50th birthday.  

Demystifying, General Info, SSA, SSDI

Do I really have to go before a judge at a hearing?

A hearing? A Judge? Sounds scary. At the hearing stage of the disability determination process, a claimant goes before an administrative law judge to explain why they are disabled. This may seem scary or intimidating, but it’s not like going to criminal court. This is actually your best chance to be awarded benefits, because you become a real person rather than just a name on the computer or in the stack of medical records and forms. The actual hearing is not meant be intimidating. However, unless you have an attorney who understands not only the structure of the hearing, but also the underlying rules and regulations surrounding disability, the hearing can be like being lost in the woods without a map. At the hearing, the judge and your attorney will ask questions about your conditions, your limitations, your medical history, and your work history. There might also be a doctor or job expert there for the judge or your attorney to get information from. This is a good thing. The hearing is a chance to become a person to go in and say “this is me, and this is why I can not work.” Claimants should look at this as an opportunity rather than a challenge. Talk to your attorney and then go and tell the Judge what it’s like.

Demystifying, SSA, SSDI

Demystifying Entitlement Programs through Technology

It’s an election year, and the two political tickets, Obama/Biden and Romney/Paul, have very different visions for the future of your Social Security disability benefits. Mitt Romney has unleashed significant misinformation campaigns to keep voters from casting an educated vote in November, and these misinformation campaigns involve lies about programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. If you are watching TV or listening to the radio and find yourself confused or intrigued by the claims of a paid political advertisement, there’s a new high-tech way for you to investigate: Cell phone apps for your smart phone can now fact-check political advertising. Two free apps for your smart phone will help you navigate some dubious claims this election season. One is called Super PAC. If you hold your phone up and record a political advertisement while running this app, it will listen to the ad playing on TV and inform you who paid for that ad. An Apple-specific version of this same service is called Ad Hawk. These free apps can help you avoid unofficial information that your candidate did not officially endorse – information that is likely to be biased. When your benefits are on the line, it’s important to vote, and to vote informed!

Demystifying, SSA, SSDI

Do I Qualify as a Disabled Adult Child?

In order to qualify for a Disabled Adult Child (DAC) claim, you must have a parent who is collecting Disability Insurance Benefits, retirement benefits, or is deceased. If you meet the requirements for a DAC claim, you will be eligible for benefits based on your parent’s earnings record. To be entitled to receive these benefits you must also be found disabled prior to age 22. SSA will use the same medical requirements to determine disability as with other types of claims like Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. The recipients of DAC benefits must be at least 18 years old, unmarried, and working under what Social Security calls Substantial Gainful Activity (SGA). The current SGA level is $1,010 per month gross (meaning before taxes). If your earned income is above this amount you will likely not be eligible for Social Security disability benefits. You can look into your eligibility for DAC benefits even if you are currently receiving another type of Social Security disability benefits. If you are currently receiving disability payments from Social Security, you may be eligible under a DAC claim for a higher benefit amount based on your parent’s earnings record. Additionally, if you are found eligible for DAC benefits you will also be eligible for Medicare. If you think that you may qualify for this program or have questions, please contact the Social Security disability attorneys at Greeman Toomey PLLC at (612) 332-3252, or toll-free at 1-877-332-3252.

General Info, SSA, SSDI

Expediting Claims Due to Financial Distress

Knowing that the majority of Social Security disability claims can take the better part of two years before they are ultimately resolved can create a financial crisis for those applying. Those who apply for either Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) are claiming that they can’t work on a full-time basis. As claims can take upwards of two years (or more), being without an income can put great stress on a claimant’s finances. One way claimants who are experiencing severe financial stress can speed up the process is to ask Social Security to expedite their claims. Social Security will consider moving claimants to the front of the hearing schedule if they can prove they have an inability to provide housing, food or medicine for themselves. If a claimant can prove the inability to provide any of these three things, they can possibly speed up the process in which their hearing would be scheduled. Remember, Social Security only considers individuals in dire financial need as candidates for the expedited process. To prove such a dire need claimants must provide supporting documentation such as a foreclosure notice, an eviction notice or proof they are unable to obtain food stamps or assistance with medication coverage. A new wrinkle has recently been implemented by Social Security, as it has begun to require claimants to exhaust all other resources in obtaining housing, food and/or medical coverage prior to asking a claim be expedited. This requires that the claimant request emergency housing assistance, medical coverage and food stamps at the county or state level prior to requesting that Social Security expedite a claim. If the claimant is turned down for these requests at the county or state level, Social Security will be more willing to expedite his or her claim. Remember, the Social Security Administration does not take the request to expedite lightly as many applicants for Social Security disability are facing financial difficulties. Additionally, there are thousands of claimants who are waiting for their hearings, meaning a claimant must have a very good reason or reasons to jump to the head of the line. For example, the Social Security hearing office in Minneapolis has approximately 9,000 claimants currently waiting for hearings at any given time and only expedites hearings for claimants that can prove they lack the ability provide basic needs. It is important for claimants to take advantage of all available options, including county or state assistance, before requesting their claims be expedited. If you are in need of representation on your claim, contact the Social Security disability attorneys at Greeman Toomey PLLC at 1-877-332-3252.  

Demystifying, General Info, SSA, SSDI

Why are my Social Security Disability Checks being Garnished?

Social Security operates several different programs for people with disabilities. The programs have identical standards for medical eligibility, but different standards for financial eligibility. Retired Survivors and Disability Insurance (DIB) is based upon workers’ earnings history and FICA taxes. On the other hand, the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program (which covers children, those with low-incomes, and those with insufficient work histories to qualify for DIB) is a needs-based program intended to provide minimal sustenance to keep disabled persons from becoming destitute. SSI payments are not considered by most programs to be “wages.” DIB payments are funded by the FICA taxes that are paid by employees and their employers. The amount that you receive in DIB is directly tied to the amount that you paid into the system. DIB payments are intended to substitute for the earnings that the employee would have received if they had not become disabled. Because DIB payments are considered to be a replacement for wages, DIB payments can be garnished to repay other federal programs. This includes: IRS levies for past-due taxes (up to 15% of benefits) Child support or alimony obligations. The maximum amount that be garnished for child support depends on the state where you live. Valid garnishment for court-ordered victim restitution. Federal student loans Also, at the state level, DIB payments can be garnished to pay child support payments. In general, private creditors cannot garnish your benefits to repay debts.  

Legal News, SSA, SSDI

PUT UP MY DUKES?! . . . CAN’T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG?!

Is this supposed to be an adversarial process? At a senate hearing in June 2012, the president of the Association of Administrative Law Judges presented the senate committee with several proposals which they felt would help make the Social Security disability process more efficient and more effective. Perhaps the most controversial of these suggestions is that the process be treated as adversarial in nature. In other words, the Judges Association is suggesting that claims for disability be treated as a lawsuit against the government, and that the government be represented by attorneys much like a claimant can be. It seems that the Judges Association is trying to create a conflict in a process which was not meant to be adversarial in nature. Federal regulations set forth criteria in which congress has determined the nature and scope of conditions which would qualify and individual to receive disability benefits. The administrative process allows for factual development of a claim to determine whether the criteria set forth by the Social Security Administration to protect disabled persons is met. The process is supposed to be one of fact gathering and analysis, rather than legal posturing and bickering. When a claimant applies for disability benefits, it was not intended that they be required to fight against government attorneys to find out if they qualify under the criteria set forth by congress. In short, a claimant’s application for benefits should not be treated as lawsuit until there is a legal conflict. This would only serve to punish the people the program was meant to serve. Furthermore, once it gets to Federal Court, the government is represented by attorneys. When a claim is denied by the Appeals Counsel, the next step for claimants and their attorneys is to file suit in Federal Court. At THIS stage, a legal conflict is created and it is appropriate that the interests of both sides be protected by counsel. To be clear, requiring disabled people seeking the benefits offered by the government to fight the government is inconsistent with the fact finding nature of the administrative process. Why create a fight where none exists?  

Demystifying, SSA, SSDI

Are my doctors and Social Security at odds?

My doctor tells me I am disabled, and still the Social Security Administration says I am not….what gives? Disability by its very nature is a measure of degree. How much pain? How many limitations? How many breaks are required? How much rest? And so on. The fact that your doctor says you are disabled is not the end of the inquiry by Social Security. Disability, as viewed by Social Security, is a term of art rather than an exact definition. When your doctor says you are disabled, the amount of limitation implied by this statement is not necessarily constant with a finding of disability under Social Security’s definition. The fact that the doctor says disability is present may indicate that they feel that there are some ongoing limitations, but without further elaboration, this statement can be of little consequence in the government’s determination. In a situation like this, it is important to get a more specific opinion from your doctor regarding your limitations. This is most often done in the form of an opinion letter from your doctor, or having your doctor answer specific questions which are in line with Social Security’s definition of disability. Your attorney can be very valuable in obtaining this information.  

Legal News, SSA, SSDI

Professional Football Players Suffer Long-Term Health Consequences

Interesting piece in our local paper about some of the long-term health consequences faced by former professional football players. Greeman Toomey represents many former NFL players in their Social Security disability claims, for mental and physical health conditions ranging from traumatic brain injuries and chronic traumatic encephalopathy to degenerative conditions of the knee and spine.  

Legal News, SSA, SSDI

Obliterative Bronchiolitis added to compassionate allowances

The conditioned called obliterative bronchiolitis or constructive bronchiolitis was included in the new compassionate allowances made effective on August 11, 2012. Obliterative bronchiolitis is an irreversible lung disease where the portions of the lung have been narrowed, greatly restricting one’s ability to breathe effectively. Some veterans who served in Afghanistan and Iraq have been diagnosed with obliterative bronchiolitis after inhaling toxic fumes on active duty – veterans who have been diagnosed with obliterative bronchiolitis while on active duty would be eligible to apply for Social Security disability on an expedited basis.

Scroll to Top