Author name: patrick@greemantoomey.com

General Info, SSDI

Ask a Case Manager: I lost at my hearing! What are my options now?

If you are denied at the hearing level you will receive a Notice of Decision – Unfavorable from the Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR). If you receive a Notice of Decision – Unfavorable you have two options: one is to file an appeal with the Appeals Council or to file a new claim. At Greeman Toomey, if a client is denied at their hearing, the attorney who represented you at the hearing will review the decision and your file to determine what is the best course of action. The appeal with the Appeals Council is called the Request for Review of the Hearing Decision/Order (SSA 520). This request must be filed within 60 days of the date of the decision. It is important to note that if the hearing decision is not appealed that decision is made final. The Appeals Council will review your decision to determine if the Administrative Law Judge made the correct decision at the time of the hearing. This review can take can take over a year to process. The Appeals Council has three different options. It may be decided that the decision was incorrect and you are in fact disabled. It may be determined that more information is necessary and your claim will be returned to the ODAR office for another hearing. Or the Appeals Council may deny your Request for Review. Unfortunately, we most often see that the Appeals Council denies the Request for Review. For some of our clients, it may be in their best interest to file a new claim. If this is the option that you choose, there is a 65 day waiting period from the date of the decision before filing your new application. Because the hearing decision will have been made final, when refiling the earliest you can allege disability is the day after the judge’s decision. The processing time for the new claim will be similar to your previous claim. For additional information regarding the processing of these claims please refer to this earlier blog post.

Legal News

Allen West: Social Security is ‘modern slavery’

Comments by Florida Congressman Allen West – comparing Social Security Disability benefits to ‘modern, 21st century slavery’ – are generating lots of chatter on the internet. Congressman West does not explain how, exactly, an insurance policy that American taxpayers have paid into through their own earnings is somehow analogous to forced labor secured by threat of violence.   He has since attempted to retract his controversial comments.

Demystifying

Why does Social Security Disability Take So Long?

The most asked question by anyone who has ever gone through the Social Security disability process has to be “why does it take so long?” In reality, it’s an easy question to answer, but not as easily accepted. Most of the people who apply and are awarded benefits for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) face an approximate wait time of up to two years, depending on what part of the country they live in, before claims are ultimately decided. The main reason for this is that the majority of SSDI and SSI applicants have to appear at a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge before benefits are awarded because Social Security denied them on two previous attempts to acquire benefits. The Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in Minneapolis, the Social Security office that schedules and administers hearings, has up to 10,000 cases on any given day that are waiting to be scheduled for a hearing. The number of cases waiting to be scheduled for a hearing in other jurisdictions varies. Because there are this many cases waiting to be scheduled in Minneapolis it takes 12 to 15 months before a hearing will be held because there not enough judges to hear all the requests for hearings in a timely manner. Other jurisdictions face wait times between 8 and 20 months for hearings. If you are someone who is waiting 12 to 15 months for a hearing that means you have already been denied SSDI or SSI on two previous occasions, which results in you having spent up to 10 months on this process before you even have chance to request a hearing. With this knowledge it’s easy to see why Social Security disability cases can drag on. It is true that not everyone who applies for SSDI or SSI have to go to a hearing before they are approved. About 25 percent of applicants are approved on initial application and another 10 percent or so are approved after their first appeal. Even if you are approved at one of these two levels the process can still take several months. You may know someone who didn’t have to wait a long time before they were approved, but these people are the exception to the rule. If you have to go to a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge for your SSDI or SSI case, you have a lot of company. This link explains the appeals and hearing process.

Legal News

SSA Cutting Costs?

The Wall Street Journal published this article last November discussing how the Social Security Administration (SSA) is cutting costs generated by the doctors employed to review cases. Per the article, the doctors are receiving less money per case reviewed, have been pressured to review an incredibly large number of cases, and are reviewing cases outside of their medical specialty. The article provides a clear example of what can happen when medical experts are overworked and are asked to review conditions outside of the specialty: Mr. Bunn’s claim based upon a neurological condition typically found in older individuals was denied due to an opinion provided by a pediatrician despite two supportive opinions provided by Mr. Bunn, leading to a claim that was eventually resolved by an Administrative Law Judge over two years later and after much financial hardship.

Demystifying

Ask a Case Manager: I got a letter about the Virtual Screening Unit. What's that?

As a case manager, I am always glad to hear when one of our client’s gets selected for the Virtual Screening Unit (VSU). This can potentially speed up the processing time of your claim and get the benefits you deserve in your hands faster. The VSU is a program developed by the Social Security Administration (SSA) to reduce the backlog of claims waiting for a hearing. Claims selected by the VSU are claims currently waiting for a hearing at one of the SSA Offices of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR). If your claim is selected by the VSU, an attorney adjudicator will review your file in an effort to determine if a fully favorable decision can be issued without having a hearing. A fully favorable decision means that SSA agrees that you are disabled and agrees to the exact date that you alleged onset of your disability. At Greeman Toomey, if one of our client’s receives a VSU notice, we update their file immediately. You will receive a phone call from one of the members of our medical records staff to confirm we have requested records from all the appropriate medical sources. Once received we will submit all of these records to the attorney adjudicator the at the VSU. We would also want to make contact with your supportive doctors. If you are treating with a doctor for your physical or mental health conditions and believe that doctor would be supportive of your claim, we have a special form we will ask them to complete regarding your conditions, restrictions and limitations. Also if you have any supportive documents in your possession that have not already been submitted to SSA please provide our office with copies. After reviewing the information submitted, the attorney adjudicator may try to make a decision within the next 7-14 days. Sometimes the adjudicator may need some clarification regarding your medical information. An example would be when a specific condition was diagnosed or a treatment plan was prescribed. The adjudicator may also request additional information regarding your past relevant work, such as a job description or confirming whether previous employment was full time or part-time. If a fully favorable decision cannot be issued, your claim will be sent back to the appropriate ODAR office. Claims returned to the ODAR office go back in line in their original order, not causing any delay in the scheduling of your upcoming hearing. Should you have any questions please feel free to contact your case manager at (612) 332-3252 or toll free at (877) 332-3252.

Demystifying

Medical Expert Interrogatories

A prior blog post entitled “Medically Equaling Analysis at Step Three of the Sequential Process” discussed the importance of having an updated opinion from a Medical Expert. If additional medical evidence obtained after the State agency physician reviewed the claim suggests that a medical equivalence may be reasonable, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) must obtain an updated medical opinion from a Medical Expert. This requirement may be satisfied by either having a Medical Expert present during a hearing to testify, or by obtaining his or her opinion through interrogatories (i.e., a set of written questions). HALLEX I-2-5-44 outlines what an ALJ must do when the ALJ receives a Medical Expert’s response to his or her interrogatories. When the ALJ receives a Medical Expert’s response to his or her interrogatories, the ALJ must: Provide a copy of the response to the claimant and the representative and notify them of the right to comment, submit further relevant evidence, propose additional interrogatories to the ME, and request a supplemental hearing with opportunity to question the ME at the supplemental hearing. If the claimant requests a supplemental hearing, the ALJ must grant the request, unless the ALJ receives additional documentary evidence that supports a fully favorable decision. Questioning a Medical Expert is an essential part of a Social Security disability attorney’s job. Therefore, understanding the procedures and rules surrounding Medical Expert interrogatories is imperative.

Legal News

SSDI Testimony Before Congress

On June 27, 2012 the House Ways and Means Committee Subcommittee on Social Security held hearings on the Social Security Disability appeals process. I’m linking to two interesting statements, one from the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities, and one from the president of the Association of Administrative Law Judges. I found the disparate opinions between the two groups fascinating – both have similar complaints about the system, but they come to diametrically opposed conclusions about how to fix it. (Sound familiar, Congress?) Some interesting facts from the statements: 70% of SSDI beneficiaries are 50 years old or older. 66% have a high school education or less, and 33% did not finish high school. As of May 2012, the average wait time for a hearing was 353 days. The SSA has closed 160 remote hearing site locations and laid off 9,000 employees in the last three years.  In 2011, the nationwide allowance rate approving disability claims was 58% (four points lower than in 2010.) Administrative law judges are instructed to spend no more than 2 ½ hours on each individual case, each of which includes – on average – over 600 pages of medical records. Judges are encouraged to meet a quota of up to 700 decisions per year. Stay tuned for new developments. If you have opinions, share it with your representatives. Contact information is available here.

General Info

What Can a Social Security Disability Attorney Do for You?

Under the Social Security Disability and Supplemental Security Income system, a claimant can file on their own. They can do so online at www.socialsecurity.gov, or by calling 1-800-772-1213. However, while a claimant doesn’t need an attorney to file for Social Security Disability or Supplemental Security Income, having an attorney provides a great deal of advantages. A Social Security Disability law firm has attorney’s and staff on hand to help a claimant through every step of the way, from initial filings, appeals, meeting and reminding claimants of deadlines, to representation at a hearing. THE INITIAL APPLICATION: An attorney’s office can help an individual claimant file his initial application. The attorney or professional staff member will work closely with the claimant, trying to find out every doctor source, a work history, dates when the claimant stopped working (or was first bothered by the disabling conditions), and everything else necessary to file the initial application. The office will keep all the evidence of receipt on hand, in case there is any dispute as to when it is received by Social Security. The office will make sure the initial application is as complete and informing as possible, so if there is an opportunity for the claimant to win on the difficult lower levels, that opportunity will not be missed. The attorney office will also send questionnaires out to supportive doctors who are treating you, asking specific and pointed questions about your capacities to do work. While the initial application is pending, we will be cc’d on all your mail from the SSA regarding your claim. This will allow us to give reminders to you as to deadlines for paperwork, or CE appointments, to make sure they are met, and the process goes smoothly. REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATIONS (in states where they apply): If a claimant gets denied on the initial application level, the attorney office, in most cases, will also receive the denial letter, and waste no time in reaching out to the claimant. The attorney office will then go over all the necessary facts to file the appeal, and make sure the 60 day filing deadline is met. If, for whatever reason, the attorney office cannot get into contact with the claimant as the 60 day deadline approaches, the attorney office will file protectively online, stopping the 60 day clock for the claimant. We will also maintain all the printouts of the online receipts, to prove receipt by the SSA. If, for any reason, the online appeal process is not available (The US Government can get IT issues of its own), we will file the appeal using US Mail and SSA paper forms. While the request for reconsideration is pending, we will also be serving as reminders to the claimant to meet any paperwork deadlines. During both these processes, if a claimant updates his/her address, or has new medical tests, seeks treatment at a new facility, has a trip to the ER, or a hospitalization, we will be updating Social Security, to make sure they retrieve the medical records for those visits (increasing the amount of evidence for the claim), and making sure the time sensitive mail goes to the right place. HEARINGS: A claimant’s attorney’s office will be cc’d on any denial where the next step is to request a hearing. That office will waste no time in contacting the claimant (or filing protectively if they can’t). The attorney office will go over with the claimant, all the facts necessary for the disability report to accompany the appeal. As the actual hearing date approaches, the attorney office will request medical records from the claimant’s treating sources, to further build the evidence of record. The attorney will prep the claimant for the hearing, letting him or her know everything to expect at the hearing. At the hearing, the attorney will make arguments to the judge, ask questions of the experts, and even ask questions of the claimant, highlighting specific points of information that is beneficial to the claim. If the hearing results in an Unfavorable Decision, the attorney office can then advise the client as to whether the next best step is to appeal to the Appeals Counsel in Virginia, or re-file the claim. If the best next step turns out to be an appeal, the attorney office can help the claimant meet the deadline for the appeal, and, if necessary, write a brief to the Appeals Council, highlighting why a reversal or a new hearing may be the best course of action. One of the most important goals that a Social Security Disability Attorney’s office achieves is keeping the claimant informed every step of the way. They help the claimant know what is going on with the claim, why Social Security is taking an action, or not taking an action, and keeping the claimant informed of their rights. This helps the claimant make well informed decisions during the claim, and ensures a smoother process. While a claimant can go through the process alone, it can be nice to know that a claimant doesn’t have to.

General Info, Legal News

Nationwide Practice

The attorneys at Greeman Toomey represent Social Security disability claimants across the United States of America. In June 2012 alone, we represented clients at hearings in 15 states: Arizona, California, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Texas, and Wisconsin, and across our home state of Minnesota. Nationwide representation means that many of our attorneys are working from the road for days at a time, which would never be possible without the organization and support of our dedicated Minneapolis-based staff. Nationwide representation also means that Greeman Toomey’s attorneys are knowledgeable about nuances between different Federal circuits. Did you know, for example, that a prior decision by an Administrative Law Judge has a different legal effect in the 6th Circuit than in the 9th Circuit? In the 6th Circuit, the cases of Drummond v. Commissioner of Social Security, 126 F.3d 837 (6th Cir. 1997) (http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/rulings/ar/06/AR98-04-ar-06.html and Dennard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 907 F.2d 598 (6th Cir. 1990) (http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/rulings/ar/06/AR98-03-ar-06.html) have been accepted as Social Security Acquiescence Rulings 98-4(6) and 98-3(6). In the 9th Circuit, however, the legal effect of a prior Administrative Law Judge decision is governed by Acquiescence Ruling 97-4(9), Chavez v. Bowen, 844 F.2d 691 (9th Cir. 1988) (http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/rulings/ar/09/AR97-04-ar-09.html). This is just one example of a legal difference that stems from the geography of your case. If you have already been denied by an Administrative Law Judge and are looking for representation for a new Social Security claim, make sure your representative knows how to help! For attorneys with the competence to examine your case from every angle and fight for your benefits nation-wide, call Greeman Toomey.

Demystifying

Expedited Hearing Request

Due to the high volumes of Social Security Disability claims waiting for a hearing by an Administrative Law Judge, the average wait time is between 12-15 months. This can be financially straining for many people pursuing disability claims. Clients frequently ask me if there is any way to speed up this process. The Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) will expedite a claim if the claimant is in “dire need.” SSA classifies this as the inability to obtain food, medicine or shelter. In order to request an expedited hearing, please provide a written letter explaining your current financial situation. It is also important to show documentation, such as an eviction or foreclosure notice, to verify your financial need. Utility disconnect or shut-off notice are other examples of helpful documentation. It is very important to show proof of your hardship or SSA may not grant this request. If your request is granted it does not mean that your hearing will take place immediately but rather when the ODAR office is able to fit your claim into their schedule. ODAR offices are typically scheduling hearings two to three months in advance. Successful requests for expedited hearings may speed up the process by several months, potentially alleviating the financial difficulties experienced while awaiting your hearing. For more detailed information regarding this process, click here. (Section B, number 4).

Scroll to Top