Author name: patrick@greemantoomey.com

Demystifying, General Info, SSA, SSDI

Why are my Social Security Disability Checks being Garnished?

Social Security operates several different programs for people with disabilities. The programs have identical standards for medical eligibility, but different standards for financial eligibility. Retired Survivors and Disability Insurance (DIB) is based upon workers’ earnings history and FICA taxes. On the other hand, the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program (which covers children, those with low-incomes, and those with insufficient work histories to qualify for DIB) is a needs-based program intended to provide minimal sustenance to keep disabled persons from becoming destitute. SSI payments are not considered by most programs to be “wages.” DIB payments are funded by the FICA taxes that are paid by employees and their employers. The amount that you receive in DIB is directly tied to the amount that you paid into the system. DIB payments are intended to substitute for the earnings that the employee would have received if they had not become disabled. Because DIB payments are considered to be a replacement for wages, DIB payments can be garnished to repay other federal programs. This includes: IRS levies for past-due taxes (up to 15% of benefits) Child support or alimony obligations. The maximum amount that be garnished for child support depends on the state where you live. Valid garnishment for court-ordered victim restitution. Federal student loans Also, at the state level, DIB payments can be garnished to pay child support payments. In general, private creditors cannot garnish your benefits to repay debts.  

Legal News, SSA, SSDI

PUT UP MY DUKES?! . . . CAN’T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG?!

Is this supposed to be an adversarial process? At a senate hearing in June 2012, the president of the Association of Administrative Law Judges presented the senate committee with several proposals which they felt would help make the Social Security disability process more efficient and more effective. Perhaps the most controversial of these suggestions is that the process be treated as adversarial in nature. In other words, the Judges Association is suggesting that claims for disability be treated as a lawsuit against the government, and that the government be represented by attorneys much like a claimant can be. It seems that the Judges Association is trying to create a conflict in a process which was not meant to be adversarial in nature. Federal regulations set forth criteria in which congress has determined the nature and scope of conditions which would qualify and individual to receive disability benefits. The administrative process allows for factual development of a claim to determine whether the criteria set forth by the Social Security Administration to protect disabled persons is met. The process is supposed to be one of fact gathering and analysis, rather than legal posturing and bickering. When a claimant applies for disability benefits, it was not intended that they be required to fight against government attorneys to find out if they qualify under the criteria set forth by congress. In short, a claimant’s application for benefits should not be treated as lawsuit until there is a legal conflict. This would only serve to punish the people the program was meant to serve. Furthermore, once it gets to Federal Court, the government is represented by attorneys. When a claim is denied by the Appeals Counsel, the next step for claimants and their attorneys is to file suit in Federal Court. At THIS stage, a legal conflict is created and it is appropriate that the interests of both sides be protected by counsel. To be clear, requiring disabled people seeking the benefits offered by the government to fight the government is inconsistent with the fact finding nature of the administrative process. Why create a fight where none exists?  

Demystifying, SSA, SSDI

Are my doctors and Social Security at odds?

My doctor tells me I am disabled, and still the Social Security Administration says I am not….what gives? Disability by its very nature is a measure of degree. How much pain? How many limitations? How many breaks are required? How much rest? And so on. The fact that your doctor says you are disabled is not the end of the inquiry by Social Security. Disability, as viewed by Social Security, is a term of art rather than an exact definition. When your doctor says you are disabled, the amount of limitation implied by this statement is not necessarily constant with a finding of disability under Social Security’s definition. The fact that the doctor says disability is present may indicate that they feel that there are some ongoing limitations, but without further elaboration, this statement can be of little consequence in the government’s determination. In a situation like this, it is important to get a more specific opinion from your doctor regarding your limitations. This is most often done in the form of an opinion letter from your doctor, or having your doctor answer specific questions which are in line with Social Security’s definition of disability. Your attorney can be very valuable in obtaining this information.  

Legal News, SSA, SSDI

Professional Football Players Suffer Long-Term Health Consequences

Interesting piece in our local paper about some of the long-term health consequences faced by former professional football players. Greeman Toomey represents many former NFL players in their Social Security disability claims, for mental and physical health conditions ranging from traumatic brain injuries and chronic traumatic encephalopathy to degenerative conditions of the knee and spine.  

Legal News, SSA, SSDI

Obliterative Bronchiolitis added to compassionate allowances

The conditioned called obliterative bronchiolitis or constructive bronchiolitis was included in the new compassionate allowances made effective on August 11, 2012. Obliterative bronchiolitis is an irreversible lung disease where the portions of the lung have been narrowed, greatly restricting one’s ability to breathe effectively. Some veterans who served in Afghanistan and Iraq have been diagnosed with obliterative bronchiolitis after inhaling toxic fumes on active duty – veterans who have been diagnosed with obliterative bronchiolitis while on active duty would be eligible to apply for Social Security disability on an expedited basis.

Demystifying, General Info, SSA, SSDI

I missed my appeal deadline. What can I do?

If the Social Security Administration (SSA) denies your disability claim, you have 60 days to file an appeal, plus five days to allow for mailing of the document. If you miss this deadline and still file the appeal, SSA may deny your claim because the appeal was filed late. There are some circumstances in which SSA will accept an untimely appeal. If you have good cause for missing the deadline SSA may accept the late filing. Here are a few examples of what constitutes good cause: Illnesses, injuries or conditions prevented you from contacting SSA Conditions prevented understanding or knowing about the need to file a timely request for appeal. You did not receive a notice of the determination or decision Unusual or unavoidable circumstances prevented you from filing a timely appeal If you miss the appeal deadline and wish to continue your claim, you must submit your good cause statement in writing to the local SSA district office handling your claim. The SSA office will determine whether or not your reason meets the good cause standards.  If the good cause is accepted you will be able to continue with your claim. If SSA denies your good cause statement and you wish to continue to pursue a claim, you must start a new application. The good cause statement that was submitted will be considered as protective filing for your new claim, meaning that the date of the statement will be your new application date. For more information regarding SSA’s rules on good cause, please click here.  

Demystifying, General Info, SSA, SSDI

Auxiliary benefits for dependents

If you are successful in obtaining Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits you may think that you are not entitled to any other types of Social Security benefits, but your dependents may be. Disabled workers who are awarded SSDI benefits are eligible to receive additional benefits for their dependent children if their monthly benefit is high enough and the children meet certain requirements. To qualify for auxiliary benefits the disabled worker’s children must be under 18 years old, be enrolled in school fulltime, and not married. When a disabled worker is awarded SSDI that worker is entitled to ongoing monthly benefits as well as back pay, which is determined by the established onset date of disability. Auxiliary benefits are also awarded to children on a monthly basis and back pay is owed to the children going back to the disabled worker’s established disability date. One important fact to know about auxiliary benefits is that these benefits are calculated based on how much the disabled worker’s monthly benefits will be. The auxiliary benefit amount is not determined by how many children a disabled worker has and is the same no matter how many dependents the disabled worker has. Children who are legally adopted by the disabled worker and children who do not live with the disabled worker are also eligible for auxiliary benefits. Here is how the auxiliary benefit amount is determined by the Social Security Administration: Dependents are eligible for up to 50 percent of the benefit amount awarded to the disabled worker. For example, if a disabled worker qualifies for $ 1,000 a month in SSDI benefits, the disabled worker’s child or children would qualify for $500 total per month in auxiliary benefits. Social Security has set a limit on the entire amount that can be awarded to dependents and will only pay 150 to 180 percent of the disabled worker’s benefit for dependents, no matter how many dependents they have. For more information visit: http://www.socialsecuritydisability.tv/glossary/auxiliary-benefits

General Info, Legal News, SSA, SSDI

On A Personal Note by James Greeman

Mitt Romney’s recent decision to pick Congressman Paul Ryan as his running mate has brought Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security to the forefront of national dialogue. As a child, Paul Ryan received survivor’s benefits from the Social Security Administration, a fact that has been much discussed in the media lately. “It was a tough time for our family, and Social Security was there to help us when we needed the help,” Ryan told the Associated Press in 2005.  Yet Ryan has focused his Congressional career on slashing entitlement programs and privatizing Social Security. Paul Ryan and I have a lot more in common than he would probably like to admit. My father died when I was eight, leaving my mother with seven children, five of them under 12 years old. My father had been a high earner who paid significant amounts into the Social Security system before his death, like Paul Ryan’s father. Although my mother ran her own small business, she could not support our family on her own. In the 1970s she received $1500 a month in Social Security survivor’s benefits for our family of eight. Despite this government aid and my mother’s income, our house occasionally faced foreclosure, we ate canned food without labels from discount bins at supermarkets, and the family would cram into one room to sleep on nights when the utilities were cut – this was before Minnesotahad established a cold weather rule. But our Social Security benefits ensured a modicum of stability. Without those benefits my mother would not have been able to provide for our basic needs. With them, she created a home where esteem and self-actualization, to borrow terms from Maslow’s Hierarchy, were possible. Today, five of us are college graduates. Three have post-graduate diplomas, and five own their own business. One of my siblings has traveled to over 100 countries. Paul Ryan used his Social Security benefits to attend college. The survivor’s benefits paid to us as children have been repaid many times over by the taxes my siblings and our corporations have paid as adults, and by the jobs our small companies have created. Over my career, I have paid Social Security taxes for at least 750 employees. The Federal government invested in me, and it invested in Paul Ryan, and those investments have returned manifold interest. Despite his personal enrichment from Social Security survivor’s benefits, Paul Ryan is building his career on dismantling our national entitlement programs. Since 1935, our government has helped widows like my mother, and Paul Ryan’s mother, rear their children after a family tragedy. If Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan win the election, where will American families turn?  

General Info, SSA, SSDI

James Greeman to speak at Minnesota Association for Justice’s 30th Anniversary conference

Greeman Toomey’s own James Greeman will be speaking about Social Security Issues at the Minnesota Association of Justice’s annual convention this weekend. The Minnesota Association for Justice (MAJ) was established in 1954 by a small group of lawyers dedicated to protecting the rights of the injured and accused. MAJ’s mission is to represent the overall interests of plaintiffs’ trial lawyers, their clients and their profession. MAJ advances public policy solutions in support of Minnesota’s consumers who have been wrongfully harmed in person, property or human rights, while also promoting and supporting professional standards of excellence for Minnesota’s plaintiffs’ trial lawyers. 2012 marks the 30th anniversary of the MAJ. Attorney James Greeman will be the first speaker amongst a distinguished group of presenters and panelists.  

Demystifying, General Info, SSA, SSDI

Plan to Achieve Self-Support (PASS)

If you receive SSI or could qualify for SSI after setting aside some income or resources, you could benefit from a PASS. A PASS allows you to set aside income besides your SSI for a specified period of time so that you may pursue a work goal that will reduce or eliminate the SSI or SSDI benefits you currently receive. For example, if you receive SSDI, wages, or other income, you could set aside some of that money to pay expenses for education, vocational training, or starting a business. Social Security does not count the income you set aside under a PASS when figuring your SSI payment amount. Also, Social Security does not count the resources you set aside under a PASS when determining your initial and continuing eligibility for SSI.  As a result, a PASS can help you establish or maintain SSI eligibility and may increase your SSI payment amount. For example, if you receive $800 per month in SSDI, you have too much income to be eligible for SSI. But if you otherwise qualify for SSI and have a work goal, you could use some of your SSDI to pay for PASS expenses to help you reach your work goal. Because we would not count the portion of your SSDI you are using toward your PASS, this could reduce your countable income enough so you could be eligible for SSI. A PASS must be (1) designed for you; (2) in writing; (3) have a specific work goal you are capable of performing; (4) have a specific timeframe for reaching that goal; (5) show what income you receive and/or resources you have that you will use to reach your goal; (6) show how you will use your income and resources to reach your goal; and (7) show how the money set aside will be kept separate from other funds.  A PASS must be approved by Social Security and will be reviewed periodically. Social Security has created a form, SSA-545-BK, for PASS applications that will assist you in compiling all the necessary information and presenting your goal in an organized way.  Here is a link to the form: http://www.ssa.gov/online/ssa-545.html.  Also, here’s a link to a website run by Cornell University’s Employment and Disability Institute that discusses PASS in more detail, provides sample answers for the application, and lists possible considerations for deciding whether a PASS might be right for you:  http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/edi/pass/ .

Scroll to Top