Author name: patrick@greemantoomey.com

Demystifying, SSA, SSDI

Demystifying: Credibility

Many disability claimants who receive a written decision from an Administrative Law Judge are surprised to find a paragraph in the decision discussing whether the claimant is “credible.” This part of the decision often seems like a personal attack. This article explains what this “credibility analysis” is, and what judges have to consider in each case. A symptom is something the claimant experiences personally. Pain, anxiety, sadness, tiredness, and even things like rashes or vomiting are all symptoms: they are the outward signs of the sickness the claimant believes makes them disabled. No symptom can prove a claimant is disabled, no matter how genuine the individual’s complaints are, unless there are medical signs and laboratory findings demonstrating “medically determinable physical or mental impairments that could reasonably be expected to produce the symptoms.” 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1529 and 416.929; Social Security Ruling (SSR) 96-7p. After the SSA decides that medical evidence proves a “medically determinable impairment,” the judge examines the intensity, persistence, and pace of symptoms to determine how the symptoms might limit the claimant’s ability to work. The judge must consider “all the available evidence.” 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1529(c) and 416.929(c); Social Security Ruling (SSR) 96-7p. There are seven specific credibility factors the judge should consider: (i) Daily activities; (ii) The location, duration, frequency, and intensity of pain or other symptoms; (iii) Precipitating and aggravating factors; (iv) The type, dosage, effectiveness, and side effects of any medication taken; (v) Treatment other than medication for relief of pain or other symptoms; (vi) Any other measures used to relieve pain or other symptoms (e.g., standing for 15 to 20 minutes every hour, sleeping on a board, etc.); and (vii) Other factors. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1529(c) and 416.929(c); Social Security Ruling (SSR) 96-7p. The judge will consider all the observations and opinions of doctors, teachers, counselors, nurses, and other sources about the claimant’s attitude, behavior, symptoms, test results, and remarks. The judge also considers the claimant’s testimony at their hearing, and all the written responses the claimant submitted on SSA forms throughout the application process. The credibility analysis is not intended as a personal attack. The purpose is to examine symptoms as they are recorded by third parties and remembered by the claimant, and to determine how the intensity, persistence, and pace of symptoms might limit the claimant’s capacity for work. This analysis is required by SSA regulations, and is part of every decision.  

Demystifying, SSA, SSDI

Why is money being deducted from my monthly SSI benefits?

If you are receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments and have any additional income the Social Security Administration (SSA) may deduct the value or partial value of that income from each of your monthly checks. SSA makes these deductions because SSI payments are based upon the recipient’s financial need. As of January 2012, the maximum monthly benefits for SSI is $698. Any necessary deductions will be subtracted from that amount. SSA classifies income as any of the following, click here for direct link to SSA’s website: · Earned Income is considered to be wages from working or self-employment net-income. · Unearned Income is all income that is not earned by working. For example pensions, State disability payments, unemployment benefits, and cash from friends and relatives all are considered unearned income. · In–Kind Income is food or shelter given to you for free or less than its fair market value. · Deemed Income is the part of the income of your spouse or parent(s) that you live with that is deducted from your benefits. If you are receiving any type of the above stated income SSA will make a deduction. Depending on what type of income you are receiving the calculation of the deductions will be different. For all types of income SSA exempts the first $20. For earned income, SSA will exempt the first $20. Then exempt an additional $65. Any earned income over $65 will then be divided into half and deducted from your monthly benefit amount. For example, if you are receiving SSI and make $200 per month in earned income, the deduction will be made like this: $200 – 20 = $180 – 65 = $115.00/2 = $57.50 Meaning $57.50 would be deducted from the maximum SSI payment of $698.00 month. For unearned income, SSA will still exempt the first $20 but any amount above that will have a dollar for dollar deduction. For example, if you have unearned income valued at $200 per month, the calculation of your deduction will look like this: $200 – 20 = $180 Meaning that $180 would be deducted for the maximum SSI payment of $698.00 per month, resulting in a monthly benefit amount of $510. The value of any in-kind income is deducted in the same fashion as unearned income. For deemed income a portion of the value of your spouse’s or parent(s)’ income may be deducted. SSA does recognize several exemptions which do not offset the monthly benefit amount. For example, the value of food stamps or assistance based on need from a state/local government. For more examples of these exemptions and SSA’s rules on SSI payments please click here.  

General Info, SSA, SSDI

The Greeman Toomey Blog

The Greeman Toomey Blog is updated nearly every day with insights, updates and explanations of the issues surrounding the practice of Social Security Disability law.  The group of content writers for the GT Blog is comprised of 10 SSDI attorneys and a couple experienced paralegals who deal directly with their subject matter daily.  If you have any suggestions or questions you would like the bloggers to address, please contact us through the form on this website. You can receive blog updates via our Twitter feed, our Google+ page, by liking us on Facebook or just check back here. Thanks for reading the GT Blog!

Demystifying, SSA, SSDI

SSI For A Child

The rules for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) are clearly related to an applicant’s ability to work. An adult applicant must prove they are unable to work at a substantial gainful level, but what about SSI for children? Obviously the ability to work cannot be considered in determining the disability of child. To medically qualify for SSI a child must have a physical or mental condition that seriously limits his or her activities and the condition must last for a 12-month consecutive period. Children do not have to be a specific age to qualify for SSI; children from birth to 18 may qualify for SSI, and those young adults age 18-22 who can no longer qualify for children’s SSI benefits, may qualify for benefits from a parent’s Social Security earnings. For more clarification visit: http://www.socialsecurity.gov/disability/disability_starter_kits_child_factsheet.htm#disability. Once qualifying requirements are satisfied then income requirements must be met for a child to potentially be eligible for SSI. Social Security will consider all household income, the number of parents present in the household, and the number of non-disabled children in the household when determining SSI eligibility for a child. Below is a chart that specifies monthly household income limitations for child SSI eligibility. Those who are earning over the limitation will not have a child who is eligible for SSI.   Non-Disabled Children          One Parent Income    Two Parent Income               0                                              $2,917                         $3,617 1                                              $3,267                         $3,967 2                                              $3,617                         $4,317 3                                              $3,967                         $4,667 4                                              $4,317                         $5,017 5                                              $4,667                         $5,367 6                                              $5,017                         $5,717   The above income limits do not apply when:   The parent(s) receive(s) both earned income (for example, wages or net earnings from self-employment) and unearned income (for example, Social Security benefits, pensions, unemployment compensation, interest income, and State disability). The parent(s) receive(s) a public income maintenance payment such as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), or a needs–based pension from the Department of Veterans Affairs. The parent pays court-ordered support payments. The child has income of his or her own. Any ineligible child has income of his or her own, marries, or leaves the home. There is more than one disabled child applying for or receiving SSI benefits. Your State supplements the Federal benefit.  

Legal News, SSA, SSDI

47%er Receiving Social Security Disability Speaks Out

A great, succinct response to what was wrong with Senator Coburn’s assumptions about people receiving disability benefits and candidate Romney’s assertions about the ‘dependant’ 47% can be found here. The subject of the article, 62 year old Sandra Johnson, began working when she was 16 years old, and she held steady full-time work for most of her life.  After developing arthritis in her knees and undergoing treatment for her second round of breast cancer last year, she dropped down to part-time work and began receiving Social Security Disability benefits.  In her words: “It’s not the government’s money. It’s my money…I worked and I earned it. I paid in enough years to get these benefits.” On Romney, she says: “As big as his head seems to be, his words are very small.  He is trying to divide the people. I thought we were supposed to be equal.”

Legal News, SSA, SSDI

Senator Coburn's Tree Trimmer

Recently, a Senate investigative subcommittee issued a report regarding 300 Social Security disability claims approved by Administrative Law Judges (ALJ). Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma is the ranking Republican member of the subcommittee and has been one the public faces of the subcommittee’s investigation. Senator Coburn has stated he called for this investigation of the disability program after learning that a man he hired to removed trees on his property was also receiving Social Security disability benefits. From what it appears, Senator Coburn’s interaction with this unnamed tree trimmer led him to suspect widespread cheating of the system and to call for the subcommittee to perform its investigation – the result of which was highly inflammatory and wildly misleading report about the Social Security disability hearing process.  The problems with the report itself are numerous, and will be the subject of additional blog posts in coming days.  Today’s post will concentrate on a more discrete issue: whether the mere fact that the unnamed man was working made him ineligible for Social Security benefits as presented by Senator Coburn. Per the Washington Post article, the man requested Senator Coburn to make the check out to his mother, the man was “working on the side” while collecting disability, and the man “canceled his disability claim.” As the saying goes, the Devil is in the details and the various articles mentioning Senator Coburn’s story do not clarify whether the man was actually awarded benefits, waiting for a determination on a pending application, what the man was alleging his disability or disabilities to be, or how long the man had been working. Attempting to hide income is inarguably deceitful and likely illegal behavior, but the mere fact that someone is doing any kind of work does not mean that said person is not disabled. A person’s ability to work and eligibility to receive benefits is based upon said person’s residual functional capacity (RFC) to perform work on a regular and continuing basis (IE – eight hours a day, five days a week). We know Senator Coburn was suspicious because the unnamed tree trimmer was “able to shimmy up tree trunks,” but we do not know if the unnamed man’s disability involved physical or mental limitations. We do not know if the unnamed man suffered from chronic asthma and severe COPD that would have made it necessary for him to spend a full day to recover from performing an eight hour day or work, leaving him unable to work on a full time basis. Perhaps the unnamed man was suffering from an impingement in his lower back and is able to work only one or two days a week until the pain is too unbearable and he is bedridden for several days. It’s also possible the unnamed man suffered from a mental disability, something that has no effect on his ability to physically perform the tree trimming job. A person could have the strength of an Olympic-class weightlifter, the balance of a gymnast and the endurance of a marathon runner but could still qualify if his or her verbal, performance or full score IQ is scored at a 59 or less, rendering the person unable to maintain competitive employment on a full time basis. Or, the unnamed man could be suffering from a severe case of PTSD that includes frequent flashbacks and extreme nightmares, giving him maybe one to two “good days” a week; Senator Coburn’s trees could have easily been cleared on a “good day.” How often the unnamed man worked and how much he was getting paid is another detail we are missing. Work performed under the Substantial Gainful Activity (SGA) threshold of $1,010 gross monthly income is allowed under the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) rules – Senator Coburn’s unnamed tree trimmer may have been performing the work on a part-time basis because of his disabilities and receiving less than $1,010 a month in payment – in this scenario, the unnamed man would still have been eligible for benefits. Finally, even if the unnamed man was working full time or grossing more than $1,010 a month there are at least two scenarios where he could continue to receive benefits. If his claim was still pending and he had been working for less than six months, then his return to work could likely be treated as an unsuccessful work attempt (UWA) and not affect his claim for benefits. If he was already receiving benefits and had been working for less than nine months, his work could be considered a trial work period (TWP) and he would be entitled to continue to receive benefits until the TWP ended. Potential fraud notwithstanding, Senator Coburn’s implied assessment of the unnamed man being ineligible for benefits merely because the unnamed man was able to trim trees on a single property is, at best, irresponsible. A person does not need to show that they are unable to do any job, be it one day of tree trimming or even a one hour a week job stacking papers – a person is eligible for disability if they are unable to perform substantial gainful work. Arguing, even implicitly, that a man or woman is not entitled to benefits because he or she can do a single day of work reflects (perhaps willful) ignorance or gross mischaracterization of the Social Security disability process and belies a mistrust of anyone applying for benefits. If these were the guiding principles underlying Senator Coburn’s commissioning of an investigative report, its results should be viewed with caution and skepticism.

General Info

The Greeman Toomey Blog

The Greeman Toomey Blog is updated nearly every day with insights, updates and explanations of the issues surrounding the practice of Social Security Disability law.  The group of content writers for the GT Blog is comprised of 10 SSDI attorneys and a couple experienced paralegals who deal directly with their subject matter daily.  If you have any suggestions or questions you would like the bloggers to address, please contact us through the form on this website. You can receive blog updates via our Twitter feed (@greemantoomey) or by liking us on Facebookor just check back here. Thanks for reading the GT Blog!

Demystifying, SSA, SSDI

Video Teleconference Hearings (VTC)

A few days ago we talked about the effects of having your claim transferred to the National Hearing Center (link). In that post, we mentioned video teleconference (VTC) hearings, but it’s worth discussing them in a bit more depth because they can occur in places other than the National Hearing Center. A typical Social Security disability hearing takes place in a hearing room at one of the Offices of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR). Each state has at least one ODAR, and this is typically where the administrative law judges and support staff are located. At a typical hearing, the ALJ and the claimant meet face-to-face, and discuss the claimant’s conditions, work experience, and other important information. A VTC hearing has the same format as a regular hearing, but this time the claimant and the judge are not in the same room. Instead, the judge is typically at the ODAR and the claimant and his or her representative (if he or she has one) appear at a different location. The other location is often a local Social Security office, although it can also be a federal courthouse, a public library, or even a hotel conference room. In a VTC hearing, the judge and claimant are able to see one another by live video. While you can decline a VTC hearing and have one in person instead, VTC hearings are often more convenient for claimants because the VTC location may be much closer to where you live. Regardless of the location, the actual content and process of the hearing is the same as when everyone is in the same room. However, technical issues sometimes can arise, and some of the hearing sites can be difficult to find. Having a Social Security disability attorney like those from Greeman Toomey can help walk you through the process and represent your interests at your hearing.

General Info, SSA, SSDI

Do I qualify for an Expedited Reinstatement of SSDI/SSI benefits?

If you have previously received either Social Security Disability benefits or Supplemental Security Income benefits, your benefits ended due to work activity and are now unable to continue to work, you may eligible for an Expedited Reinstatement (EXR). If you apply for an EXR you can request that your benefits start again without having to complete a new disability application. In order to be eligible for an EXR you must meet the following requirements Your benefits stopped due to work earnings; You’re currently unable to work at or above Substantial Gainful Activity (As of January 2012, Substantial Gainful Activity is anything above $1010 gross income per month); Your impairments are the same or related to the impairments you were previously awarded for; and You request an EXR within 60 months from the month your benefits ended. While waiting for the determination of the EXR you may be eligible for up to six months of temporary benefits. If the EXR claim is denied you most likely will not be required to pay these benefits back. If you were previously receiving Medicare benefits you will also be entitled to Medicare during this six-month period. For some claimants it may be in their best interest to file a new claim instead of pursuing the EXR. With an EXR your monthly benefit amount will be equal to what you were previously receiving. If you have been working your primary insured amount may have increased based on the taxes you have paid in to the Social Security system. While it may take longer for your application to be processed if/when you are approved, you may be entitled to a higher monthly benefit amount with your new application. If you are unsure if you are eligible for an EXR claim or have questions on what your best option is, please contact our office at (612) 332-3252 or toll free at (877) 332-3252.

Demystifying, SSA, SSDI

What is the Ticket to Work Program?

The Ticket to Work is a free and voluntary program from Social Security that is available in all 50 states to assist disabled individuals find, enter, and maintain employment.  An individual becomes eligible to participate in the Ticket to Work program when he or she starts receiving SSDI or SSI benefits based on disability. There is no penalty for not using the program, but there are several benefits for those who choose to enroll.  First, a Ticket allows a disabled individual to obtain services from a state vocational rehabilitation (VR) agency or another approved provider of their choice – these approved providers are called “Employment Networks”.  An EN is an entity that contracts with Social Security to provide or coordinate the delivery of necessary services to disability beneficiaries. The EN can be a single individual, a partnership/alliance (public and/or private) or a consortium of organizations collaborating to combine resources to serve Ticket-holders. Second, the program allows a disabled individual to continue receiving benefits and maintain Medicaid/Medicare coverage during the transition back into the workforce.  Third, the program allows individuals to select part-time or work-from-home alternatives.  Fourth, Social Security will not perform a medical review of a disability claim so long as the claimant is making “timely progress” with the use of a Ticket to Work. For more information on Ticket to Work, including a list of approved Employment Networks, call 1-866-YOURTICKET (1-866-968-7842).  For a list of approved ENs, please visit https://yourtickettowork.com/web/ttw/en-directory.

Scroll to Top